Posts

Communication Techniques for Better Conversations: Why Most Workplace Training Gets It Wrong

Three weeks ago, I watched a perfectly competent marketing manager destroy her career prospects in a single team meeting. Not through incompetence. Not through poor performance. Through absolutely shocking communication skills that would make a brick wall seem more engaging.

The irony? She'd just completed a $3,000 corporate communication course the month before.

This is exactly why I've spent the last 18 years helping Australian businesses fix what most training providers get spectacularly wrong about workplace communication. The problem isn't that people don't know they should "listen actively" or "speak clearly." The problem is that most communication training treats conversation like a series of mechanical steps rather than the messy, unpredictable human dance it actually is.

The Real Foundation: Reading the Room (Not the Manual)

Here's an unpopular opinion that'll ruffle some feathers: emotional intelligence matters more than perfect grammar in 90% of workplace conversations. I've seen tradies with Year 10 educations run circles around MBA graduates when it comes to getting their point across and building rapport with clients.

Why? Because they understand something most corporate training misses entirely.

People don't remember what you said. They remember how you made them feel.

The best communicators I know - and I'm talking about CEOs, union leaders, small business owners who've built empires from nothing - they all share one skill that's never taught in communication workshops. They can sense the emotional temperature of a room within thirty seconds and adjust their approach accordingly.

Take my mate Dave who runs a plumbing business in Perth. Dave couldn't write a formal email to save his life, but he's built a million-dollar operation because he knows exactly when to crack a joke, when to get serious, and when to just shut up and listen. That's not something you learn from a PowerPoint presentation.

The Conversation Killer: Trying Too Hard to Be Professional

Most workplace communication training teaches people to sound like robots. "Thank you for your email. I acknowledge your concerns. Let me circle back with stakeholders."

Absolute rubbish.

The most effective workplace conversations I've witnessed sound like... conversations. Real ones. Between real people who actually care about solving problems together.

I remember working with a Brisbane accounting firm where the senior partners were losing clients left and right. Not because of poor service - their technical work was flawless. But because every client interaction felt like a tax audit rather than a partnership discussion. We spent six months teaching them to sound human again. Revenue increased 40% in the following year.

Here's what actually works:

Start with genuine interest. Not "How can I help you today?" but "What's keeping you up at night?" or "Tell me what's really going on here."

Use normal words. Instead of "facilitate a solution," try "figure this out." Instead of "leverage synergies," just say "work together better."

Show your personality. The best business relationships aren't built on professional distance - they're built on human connection. If you're naturally dry and analytical, be dry and analytical. If you're enthusiastic and animated, lean into that.

The Power Question That Changes Everything

After two decades in this game, I've discovered there's one question that transforms workplace conversations more than any other communication technique: "What am I missing here?"

Not "Do you have any questions?" Not "Does that make sense?"

"What am I missing here?"

This simple phrase does three things simultaneously. It acknowledges that you don't have all the answers. It invites genuine input rather than polite agreement. And it creates psychological safety for people to share what they're really thinking.

I learned this the hard way during a project with a Melbourne manufacturing company. Spent three meetings explaining a new quality control process, getting nods and agreement from everyone. Two weeks later, the whole thing fell apart because nobody wanted to admit they didn't understand the technical requirements.

One "What am I missing here?" at the end of the first meeting would have saved everyone six months of frustration.

The Attention Span Reality Check

Let's talk about something nobody wants to acknowledge: people's attention spans are absolutely shot.

I don't care how important your quarterly review is or how brilliantly you've structured your presentation. If you're talking for more than three minutes without engaging the other person, you've lost them. They're thinking about lunch, their mortgage, whether they remembered to pick up the kids from school.

The solution isn't to talk faster or pack more information in. It's to completely rethink how you structure important conversations.

Break everything into bite-sized chunks. Make a point. Check for understanding. Get their input. Move to the next point.

Use the "headline first" approach. Start with the conclusion, then work backwards to explain how you got there. Most people present information like a mystery novel when they should be presenting it like a news article.

Build in interaction points. Every two minutes, ask a question. Any question. "How does this match your experience?" "What's your take on this?" "Am I making sense so far?"

Technology: The Communication Crutch That's Killing Connection

Another controversial take: email and Slack are making us worse communicators, not better.

Don't get me wrong - I love efficiency as much as the next person. But I've watched entire organisations forget how to have difficult conversations because everything gets filtered through digital channels where tone disappears and nuance dies.

The rule I give all my clients is simple: If it's important enough to cause confusion or conflict, it's important enough for a voice conversation.

Yes, even if it's inconvenient. Yes, even if you're busy. Yes, even if the other person prefers email.

Because here's what happens when you try to resolve complex issues through text: misunderstandings multiply, emotions escalate, and what should have been a five-minute clarification turns into a week-long email tennis match that achieves nothing except mutual frustration.

Some of the most successful business leaders I know have a strict policy: anything that requires more than two back-and-forth emails gets handled with a phone call or face-to-face meeting. It's old-fashioned, but it works.

The Feedback Conversation: Where Most Leaders Fail Spectacularly

Performance feedback is where communication skills go to die. I've seen managers tie themselves in knots trying to deliver constructive criticism without hurting anyone's feelings. The result? Feedback so watered down and wrapped in corporate speak that the recipient has no idea what they're supposed to change.

Here's how the professionals do it:

Be specific about behaviour, not personality. Don't say "You need to be more organised." Say "The Johnson proposal was submitted two days late, and three sections were incomplete."

Focus on impact, not intent. Don't psychoanalyse why someone did something. Explain the consequences of what they did.

Make it a conversation, not a lecture. Ask what they think went wrong. Ask what support they need. Ask how they want to handle similar situations differently.

I worked with a Sydney law firm where one partner was notorious for giving feedback that left people confused and demoralised. We spent months working on his approach, and the breakthrough came when he stopped trying to be "nice" and started being clear. His team's performance improved dramatically because they finally understood what was expected of them.

The Meeting Trap: Why Most Business Conversations Waste Everyone's Time

Let me share a shocking statistic: 67% of senior managers report that they spend too much time in meetings. But here's the thing nobody talks about - most of those meetings aren't actually meetings at all. They're just poorly structured conversations that drag on forever because nobody knows how to facilitate them properly.

The best meeting facilitators I know follow one simple rule: every agenda item must have a clear outcome. Not "discuss marketing strategy" but "decide on Q3 marketing budget allocation." Not "update on project status" but "resolve the delivery timeline conflict."

When people know exactly what decision needs to be made or what problem needs to be solved, conversations become focused and productive. When they don't, you get rambling discussions that circle endlessly without reaching any useful conclusions.

Cultural Intelligence: The Skill Nobody Teaches

Australia's workplace is incredibly diverse, and yet most communication training pretends everyone shares the same cultural background and communication preferences. This is not just unrealistic - it's counterproductive.

I learned this lesson working with a Perth mining company that was having constant conflicts between their Australian supervisors and international workers. The Australians thought the workers were being disrespectful because they wouldn't speak up in meetings. The workers thought the Australians were being aggressive because they spoke so directly.

Neither group was wrong. They just had completely different communication styles shaped by their cultural backgrounds.

The solution wasn't to make everyone communicate the same way. It was to help people recognise and adapt to different styles. Some people need time to process before contributing to discussions. Others think out loud. Some prefer written communication. Others need face-to-face interaction.

Great communicators adjust their approach based on who they're talking to, not based on what feels most comfortable for them.

The Confidence Factor: Why Quiet People Often Win

Here's something that might surprise you: the best business communicators aren't always the loudest or most charismatic people in the room. Some of the most influential leaders I know are actually quite reserved in their communication style.

What they have that many extroverted personalities lack is something I call "purposeful communication." They think before they speak. They choose their words carefully. When they do contribute to conversations, people listen because they know it's going to be worthwhile.

This is particularly important for technical professionals who often feel intimidated in business conversations. You don't need to become a polished public speaker to be an effective communicator. You just need to be clear, honest, and focused on solving problems rather than impressing people.

For professionals looking to develop these skills systematically, I've found that effective communication training that focuses on practical application rather than theory tends to deliver the best results. The key is practicing in real workplace scenarios, not just role-playing exercises.

The Technology Balance: When Digital Works and When It Doesn't

While I'm critical of over-relying on digital communication, I'm not suggesting we go back to the stone age. Technology can enhance workplace conversations when used strategically.

Video calls, for instance, are brilliant for maintaining visual connection with remote team members. Screen sharing can make complex explanations much more effective. Project management tools can keep everyone aligned on priorities and deadlines.

The trick is knowing when each tool serves the conversation and when it gets in the way. Workplace communication training that includes this kind of strategic thinking about communication channels is becoming increasingly valuable as hybrid work becomes the norm.

Building Your Communication Toolkit

After nearly two decades of helping professionals improve their workplace conversations, here's what I've learned works consistently:

Practice active curiosity, not just active listening. Don't just wait for your turn to talk. Genuinely try to understand different perspectives, even when you disagree with them.

Develop your ability to summarise and clarify. Before moving on from any important discussion point, repeat back what you've heard in your own words. This catches misunderstandings before they become problems.

Learn to disagree constructively. Some of the best business conversations involve people with different viewpoints working through their differences. The skill is disagreeing with ideas while respecting the people who hold them.

Master the art of productive conflict. Not all workplace tension is bad. Sometimes it signals that important issues need to be addressed. The communication skill is channeling that energy toward problem-solving rather than letting it escalate into personal conflicts.

The Bottom Line

Effective workplace communication isn't about following scripts or memorising techniques. It's about being genuinely interested in understanding other people and solving problems together. It's about adapting your style to serve the conversation rather than forcing everyone else to adapt to you.

Most importantly, it's about remembering that behind every workplace conversation are real people with real concerns, real pressures, and real expertise to contribute. When you approach conversations with that mindset, the techniques become secondary.

The techniques matter, don't get me wrong. But they're tools in service of a larger goal: building workplaces where people can communicate openly, solve problems collaboratively, and get things done without unnecessary drama or confusion.

And that's something worth having better conversations about.